Information

The Rise of the Seleukid Empire (323-223 BC): Seleukos I to Seleukos III

The Rise of the Seleukid Empire (323-223 BC): Seleukos I to Seleukos III


We are searching data for your request:

Forums and discussions:
Manuals and reference books:
Data from registers:
Wait the end of the search in all databases.
Upon completion, a link will appear to access the found materials.

I'd recommend this for scholars and historians. It's an excellent resource for details surrounding the establishment and foundation of the Seleukid Empire. The subject is interesting, but some prior knowledge of the main political players after Alexander the Great's death is helpful.

The day Alexander the Great died, his empire began to fall apart. With no clear succession plan and only an infant son’s tenuous claim to Alexander’s legacy, his generals were no longer united by common devotion to their leader. And so, their personal motivations became the political manoeuvring that split the empire into ever-shifting pieces.

John Grainger’s The Rise of the Seleukid Empire deals primarily with the political and military exploits of one of those generals, Seleukos (aka Seleucos I), and the first century of his resulting empire. Seleukos was not one of Alexander’s star generals: the Macedonian came to command later during the campaign and was neither terrible nor a superstar. Upon their leader’s death, the generals wasted no time forming alliances and plans to continue the Empire, under the guise of holding it for Alexander’s heir. Alexander had adopted the Achaemenid rules of governance when he conquered Persia, including the regional Satrapies (governed provinces). Since many of the existing Satraps had been executed for rebellion during Alexander’s rule, the generals naturally took over these pre-existing territories in splitting up the empire. Ultimately, Seleukos and his family moved to Babylon, where he created a base kingdom resulting in a large and powerful empire.

This book is first in a series of three in-depth studies of the Seleukid dynasty and their Empire. Most of the first book in Grainger’s series gets into the political machinations amongst the emerging leaders amongst Alexander's generals, and the seemingly endless wars and jockeying between the new powers. It took Seleukos over 30 years to become secure in his Satrapy and expand it from Babylon to the surrounding areas.

Grainger does not only focus on Seleukos’s military and political successes. Missteps, betrayals, shifting loyalties, and the petty pains of ruling city-states who didn’t wish to have Macedonian rulers are all covered, to a detailed degree. Seleukos and the immediate post-Alexandrian chaos takes up nearly the first half of this volume. The later chapters cover the next three generations of leaders’ attempts to maintain or expand the original territory, ending in 223 BCE.

Seleukos’s interesting personal life is also recounted. Alexander apparently compelled his generals to marry tribal leaders’ daughters during his rule in Persia, partly to cement ties between the subject and the new ruling class and partly to keep his core group of advisors tied to lands far from home even during their occupying peace. Grainger notes that Seleukos alone of all the generals stayed married to his assigned princess after Alexander’s death, where all the rest abandoned their foreign families, which says something about either Seleukos's sentimental ties or political savvy (perhaps both). Either way, this Eastern and Macedonian tie forms the basis of the ruling family's legitimacy to both ends of the empire. The later intermarriages across competing leaders’ territories becomes a web of royal political alliances equal to the messy family relational ties of medieval Europe.

While the topic and the detail are fascinating, there seems to be an assumption by the author that the reader is well versed in all the players and tribal intricacies of the ever-changing powers in the Ancient Near- and Middle-East. This is not a fast or easy read: the political sands shift so quickly amongst the leaders and their families it would have been helpful to have a more detailed timeline included along with the maps and genealogy charts. This is especially true in the layout of the chapters, which bounce around occasionally in the timeline to cover the more mundane aspects of the evolution of Seleukid governance and city-building.

Grainger clearly has a serious passion for this topic, and The Rise of the Seleukid Empire provides all the detail any serious scholar could hope for in covering the first century of activity. He does an excellent job of giving a more objective view of Seleukos’s decisions, but the writing style can waffle between too scholarly and too much supposition. Some of the assumptions and conclusions seem to be made through a more modern lens, which I found fascinating and yet detracting from the historical record. The tactical conclusions, however, are based on the documented military moves and absolutely logical. Grainger includes plenty of background information and notes to substantiate his conclusions in the appendix.

I would recommend this book to more advanced scholars of the time period and Alexandrian history. It is a fully detailed account of the events that led to the establishment of Seleukid rule that includes scholarly leaps to fill in gaps with interesting conclusions, but it's definitely not an introductory text. I look forward to the second and third instalments of the series based on the wealth of information included in the first – truly, John Grainger provides a rich picture of life in the post-Alexandrian world.


The Rise of the Seleukid Empire (323-223 BC): Seleukos I to Seleukos III Paperback – 30 November 2018

Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.

To get the free app, enter mobile phone number.

or

Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App .


The Rise of the Seleukid Empire (323-223 BC): Seleukos I to Seleukos III - History

Use spaces to separate tags. Use single quotes (') for phrases.

Overview

The Seleukid kingdom was the largest state in the world for a century and more between Alexander's death and the rise of Rome. It was ruled for all that time by a succession of able kings, but broke down twice, before eventually succumbing to dynastic rivalries, and simultaneous external invasions and internal grasps for independence. The first king, Seleukos I, established a pattern of rule which was unusually friendly towards his subjects, and his policies promoted the steady growth of wealth and population in many areas which had been depopulated when he took them over. In particular the dynasty was active in founding cities from Asia Minor to Central Asia. Its work set the social and economic scene of the Middle East for many centuries to come. Yet these kings had to be warriors too as they defended their realm from jealous neighbours. John D Grainger's trilogy charts the rise and fall of this superpower of the ancient world. 

In the first volume, John D Grainger relates the remarkable twists of fortune and daring that saw Seleukos, an officer in an elite guard unit, emerge from the wars of the diadochi (Alexander's successors) in control of the largest and richest part of the empire of the late Alexander the Great. After his conquests and eventual murder, we then see how his successors continued his policies, including the repeated wars with the Ptolemaic rules of Egypt over control of Syria. The volume ends with the deep internal crisis and the wars of the brothers, which left only a single member of the dynasty alive in 223 BC.


The Rise of the Seleukid Empire 323-223 BC, John D Grainger

Despite the title this book actually looks at the rise and first fall of the Seleucid Empire. After a strong start the succession to the throne caused an increasing number of problems, peaking with the War of the Brothers of c.241-236, and Antiochus III the Great inherited an empire that had lost most of its eastern and western provinces to usurpers and invaders.

Seleucus I emerges as the most successful member of the dynasty. At the death of Alexander the Great he was a fairly junior army officer. In the immediate aftermath of Alexander's death he established himself as satrap of Babylon, but he was expelled from this position by Antigonus Monophthalmus, and fled into exile in Egypt. After a few years he was able to re-establish his rule in Babylon, and from then on his empire kept on expanding, until at his death he controlled all of Alexander's empire apart from Egypt and Macedonia. None of his successors were able to control quite such a large area, with bits of Anatolia falling away very quickly, but the system he set up survived Seleucus's death, and his son inherited one of the most powerful empires of the ancient world.

This isn't a well documented empire. If it produced any historians of its own their work hasn't survived. An increasing number of Babylonian records have emerged in recent years, and they are adding to our understanding of the period, but even major events such as the repeated wars with Egypt are often poorly recorded, while events in the east of the empire are often very obscure. Grainger has done an excellent job of bringing together our limited sources to produce a coherent history of this ancient power, while still acknowledging that there are areas where we simply don't know what happened.

My only quibble with this book is the use of 'k' instead of 'c'. This may well be more technically accurate, and in some places it doesn't really matter (Seleukid vs Seleucid), but for others, such as Cilicia, which appears in the text and index as Kilikia it becomes a bit of a problem. It is also applied somewhat inconsistently, with Cyrene instead of Kyrene, Cyprus instead of Kyrus.

This is only a minor quibble, and I am greatly looking forward to reading the second book in the series, on Antiochus II, and the final book, looking at the century-long second collapse of the empire.

Chapters
1 - The Collapse of Alexander's Empure
2 - Ptolemy's Commander
3 - Seleukos and Babylon
4 - Seleukos' First Kingdom
5 - Expedition to the East
6 - The Grand Alliance
7 - New Enmities, New Cities
8 - Antiochos in the East
9 - Seleukos in the West
10 - Antiochos I and the Galatians
11 - The New State
12 - Creeping Imperialism
13 - Antiochos II
14 - War, Collapse, and Fragmentation
15 - Failure

Author: John D Grainger
Edition: Hardcover
Pages:
Publisher: Pen & Sword Military
Year:


Contents

Contemporary sources, such as a loyalist decree honoring Antiochus I from Ilium, in Greek language define the Seleucid state both as an empire (arche) and as a kingdom (basileia). Similarly, Seleucid rulers were described as kings in Babylonia. [17]

Starting from the 2nd century BC, ancient writers referred to the Seleucid ruler as the King of Syria, Lord of Asia, and other designations [18] the evidence for the Seleucid rulers representing themselves as kings of Syria is provided by the inscription of Antigonus son of Menophilus, who described himself as the "admiral of Alexander, king of Syria". He refers to either Alexander Balas or Alexander II Zabinas as a ruler. [19]

Partition of Alexander's empire Edit

Alexander, who quickly conquered the Persian Empire under its last Achaemenid dynast, Darius III, died young in 323 BC, leaving an expansive empire of partly Hellenised culture without an adult heir. The empire was put under the authority of a regent in the person of Perdiccas, and the territories were divided among Alexander's generals, who thereby became satraps, at the Partition of Babylon, all in that same year.

Rise of Seleucus Edit

Alexander's generals (the Diadochi) jostled for supremacy over parts of his empire. Ptolemy, a former general and the satrap of Egypt, was the first to challenge the new system this led to the demise of Perdiccas. Ptolemy's revolt led to a new subdivision of the empire with the Partition of Triparadisus in 320 BC. Seleucus, who had been "Commander-in-Chief of the Companion cavalry" (hetairoi) and appointed first or court chiliarch (which made him the senior officer in the Royal Army after the regent and commander-in-chief Perdiccas since 323 BC, though he helped to assassinate him later) received Babylonia and, from that point, continued to expand his dominions ruthlessly. Seleucus established himself in Babylon in 312 BC, the year used as the foundation date of the Seleucid Empire.

Babylonian War (311–309 BC) Edit

The rise of Seleucus in Babylon threatened the eastern extent of Antigonus I territory in Asia. Antigonus, along with his son Demetrius I of Macedon, unsuccessfully led a campaign to annex Babylon. The victory of Seleucus ensured his claim of Babylon and legitimacy. He ruled not only Babylonia, but the entire enormous eastern part of Alexander's empire, as described by Appian:

Always lying in wait for the neighboring nations, strong in arms and persuasive in council, he [Seleucus] acquired Mesopotamia, Armenia, 'Seleucid' Cappadocia, Persis, Parthia, Bactria, Arabia, Tapouria, Sogdia, Arachosia, Hyrcania, and other adjacent peoples that had been subdued by Alexander, as far as the river Indus, so that the boundaries of his empire were the most extensive in Asia after that of Alexander. The whole region from Phrygia to the Indus was subject to Seleucus. [20]

Seleucid–Mauryan War (305–303 BC) Edit

In the region of Punjab, Chandragupta Maurya (Sandrokottos) founded the Maurya Empire in 321 BC. Chandragupta conquered the Nanda Empire in Magadha, and relocated to the capital of Pataliputra. Chandragupta then redirected his attention back to the Indus and by 317 BC he conquered the remaining Greek satraps left by Alexander. Expecting a confrontation, Seleucus gathered his army and marched to the Indus. It is said that Chandragupta could have fielded a conscript army of 600,000 men and 9,000 war elephants. [21]

Mainstream scholarship asserts that Chandragupta received, formalized through a treaty, vast territory west of the Indus, including the Hindu Kush, modern day Afghanistan, and the Balochistan province of Pakistan. [22] [23] Archaeologically, concrete indications of Mauryan rule, such as the inscriptions of the Edicts of Ashoka, are known as far as Kandahar in southern Afghanistan. According to Appian:

He [Seleucus] crossed the Indus and waged war with Sandrocottus [Maurya], king of the Indians, who dwelt on the banks of that stream, until they came to an understanding with each other and contracted a marriage relationship. [20]

It is generally thought that Chandragupta married Seleucus's daughter, or a Macedonian princess, a gift from Seleucus to formalize an alliance. In a return gesture, Chandragupta sent 500 war elephants, [24] [25] [26] [27] [28] a military asset which would play a decisive role at the Battle of Ipsus in 301 BC. In addition to this treaty, Seleucus dispatched an ambassador, Megasthenes, to Chandragupta, and later Deimakos to his son Bindusara, at the Mauryan court at Pataliputra (modern Patna in Bihar state). Megasthenes wrote detailed descriptions of India and Chandragupta's reign, which have been partly preserved to us through Diodorus Siculus. Later Ptolemy II Philadelphus, the ruler of Ptolemaic Egypt and contemporary of Ashoka the Great, is also recorded by Pliny the Elder as having sent an ambassador named Dionysius to the Mauryan court. [29]

The Indians occupy [in part] some of the countries situated along the Indus, which formerly belonged to the Persians: Alexander deprived the Ariani of them, and established there settlements of his own. But Seleucus Nicator gave them to Sandrocottus (Chandragupta Maurya) in consequence of a marriage contract, and received in return five hundred elephants. [30]

Other territories ceded before Seleucus' death were Gedrosia in the south-east of the Iranian plateau, and, to the north of this, Arachosia on the west bank of the Indus River.

Westward expansion Edit

Following his and Lysimachus' victory over Antigonus Monophthalmus at the decisive Battle of Ipsus in 301 BC, Seleucus took control over eastern Anatolia and northern Syria.

In the latter area, he founded a new capital at Antioch on the Orontes, a city he named after his father. An alternative capital was established at Seleucia on the Tigris, north of Babylon. Seleucus's empire reached its greatest extent following his defeat of his erstwhile ally, Lysimachus, at Corupedion in 281 BC, after which Seleucus expanded his control to encompass western Anatolia. He hoped further to take control of Lysimachus's lands in Europe – primarily Thrace and even Macedonia itself, but was assassinated by Ptolemy Ceraunus on landing in Europe.

His son and successor, Antiochus I Soter, was left with an enormous realm consisting of nearly all of the Asian portions of the Empire, but faced with Antigonus II Gonatas in Macedonia and Ptolemy II Philadelphus in Egypt, he proved unable to pick up where his father had left off in conquering the European portions of Alexander's empire.

Breakup of Central Asian territories Edit

Antiochus I (reigned 281–261 BC) and his son and successor Antiochus II Theos (reigned 261–246 BC) were faced with challenges in the west, including repeated wars with Ptolemy II and a Celtic invasion of Asia Minor—distracting attention from holding the eastern portions of the Empire together. Towards the end of Antiochus II's reign, various provinces simultaneously asserted their independence, such as Bactria and Sogdiana under Diodotus, Cappadocia under Ariarathes III, and Parthia under Andragoras. A few years later, the last was defeated and killed by the invading Parni of Arsaces – the region would then become the core of the Parthian Empire.

Diodotus, governor for the Bactrian territory, asserted independence in around 245 BC, although the exact date is far from certain, to form the Greco-Bactrian Kingdom. This kingdom was characterized by a rich Hellenistic culture and was to continue its domination of Bactria until around 125 BC when it was overrun by the invasion of northern nomads. One of the Greco-Bactrian kings, Demetrius I of Bactria, invaded India around 180 BC to form the Indo-Greek Kingdoms.

The rulers of Persis, called Fratarakas, also seem to have established some level of independence from the Seleucids during the 3rd century BC, especially from the time of Vahbarz. They would later overtly take the title of Kings of Persis, before becoming vassals to the newly formed Parthian Empire. [31] [32]

The Seleucid satrap of Parthia, named Andragoras, first claimed independence, in a parallel to the secession of his Bactrian neighbour. Soon after, however, a Parthian tribal chief called Arsaces invaded the Parthian territory around 238 BC to form the Arsacid dynasty, from which the Parthian Empire originated.

Antiochus II's son Seleucus II Callinicus came to the throne around 246 BC. Seleucus II was soon dramatically defeated in the Third Syrian War against Ptolemy III of Egypt and then had to fight a civil war against his own brother Antiochus Hierax. Taking advantage of this distraction, Bactria and Parthia seceded from the empire. In Asia Minor too, the Seleucid dynasty seemed to be losing control: the Gauls had fully established themselves in Galatia, semi-independent semi-Hellenized kingdoms had sprung up in Bithynia, Pontus, and Cappadocia, and the city of Pergamum in the west was asserting its independence under the Attalid Dynasty. [ citation needed ] The Seleucid economy started to show the first signs of weakness, as Galatians gained independence and Pergamum took control of coastal cities in Anatolia. Consequently, they managed to partially block contact with the West. [34]

Revival (223–191 BC) Edit

A revival would begin when Seleucus II's younger son, Antiochus III the Great, took the throne in 223 BC. Although initially unsuccessful in the Fourth Syrian War against Egypt, which led to a defeat at the Battle of Raphia (217 BC), Antiochus would prove himself to be the greatest of the Seleucid rulers after Seleucus I himself. He spent the next ten years on his anabasis (journey) through the eastern parts of his domain and restoring rebellious vassals like Parthia and Greco-Bactria to at least nominal obedience. He gained many victories such as the Battle of Mount Labus and Battle of the Arius and besieged the Bactrian capital. He even emulated Seleucus with an expedition into India where he met with King Sophagasenus (Sanskrit: Subhagasena) receiving war elephants, perhaps in accordance of the existing treaty and alliance set after the Seleucid-Mauryan War.

Actual translation of Polybius 11.34 (No other source except Polybius makes any reference to Sophagasenus):

He [Antiochus] crossed the Caucasus Indicus (Paropamisus) (Hindu Kush) and descended into India renewed his friendship with Sophagasenus the king of the Indians received more elephants, until he had a hundred and fifty altogether and having once more provisioned his troops, set out again personally with his army: leaving Androsthenes of Cyzicus the duty of taking home the treasure which this king had agreed to hand over to him. [35] Having traversed Arachosia and crossed the river Enymanthus, he came through Drangene to Carmania and as it was now winter, he put his men into winter quarters there. [36]

When he returned to the west in 205 BC, Antiochus found that with the death of Ptolemy IV, the situation now looked propitious for another western campaign. Antiochus and Philip V of Macedon then made a pact to divide the Ptolemaic possessions outside of Egypt, and in the Fifth Syrian War, the Seleucids ousted Ptolemy V from control of Coele-Syria. The Battle of Panium (200 BC) definitively transferred these holdings from the Ptolemies to the Seleucids. Antiochus appeared, at the least, to have restored the Seleucid Kingdom to glory.

Expansion into Greece and war with Rome Edit

Following the defeat of his erstwhile ally Philip by Rome in 197 BC, Antiochus saw the opportunity for expansion into Greece itself. Encouraged by the exiled Carthaginian general Hannibal, and making an alliance with the disgruntled Aetolian League, Antiochus launched an invasion across the Hellespont. With his huge army he aimed to establish the Seleucid empire as the foremost power in the Hellenic world, but these plans put the empire on a collision course with the new rising power of the Mediterranean, the Roman Republic. At the battles of Thermopylae (191 BC) and Magnesia (190 BC), Antiochus's forces suffered resounding defeats, and he was compelled to make peace and sign the Treaty of Apamea (188 BC), the main clause of which saw the Seleucids agree to pay a large indemnity, to retreat from Anatolia and to never again attempt to expand Seleucid territory west of the Taurus Mountains. The Kingdom of Pergamum and the Republic of Rhodes, Rome's allies in the war, gained the former Seleucid lands in Anatolia. Antiochus died in 187 BC on another expedition to the east, where he sought to extract money to pay the indemnity.

Roman power, Parthia and Judea Edit

The reign of his son and successor Seleucus IV Philopator (187–175 BC) was largely spent in attempts to pay the large indemnity, and Seleucus was ultimately assassinated by his minister Heliodorus.

Seleucus' younger brother, Antiochus IV Epiphanes, now seized the throne. He attempted to restore Seleucid power and prestige with a successful war against the old enemy, Ptolemaic Egypt, which met with initial success as the Seleucids defeated and drove the Egyptian army back to Alexandria itself. As the king planned on how to conclude the war, he was informed that Roman commissioners, led by the Proconsul Gaius Popillius Laenas, were near and requesting a meeting with the Seleucid king. Antiochus agreed, but when they met and Antiochus held out his hand in friendship, Popilius placed in his hand the tablets on which was written the decree of the senate and told him to read it. When the king said that he would call his friends into council and consider what he ought to do, Popilius drew a circle in the sand around the king's feet with the stick he was carrying and said, "Before you step out of that circle give me a reply to lay before the senate." For a few moments he hesitated, astounded at such a peremptory order, and at last replied, "I will do what the senate thinks right." He then chose to withdraw rather than set the empire to war with Rome again. [37]

On his return journey, according to Josephus, he made an expedition to Judea, took Jerusalem by force, slew a great many who had favored Ptolemy, sent his soldiers to plunder them without mercy. He also spoiled the temple, and put the constant practice of offering a daily sacrifice of expiation, for 3 years and 6 months. [38]

The latter part of his reign saw a further disintegration of the Empire despite his best efforts. Weakened economically, militarily and by loss of prestige, the Empire became vulnerable to rebels in the eastern areas of the empire, who began to further undermine the empire while the Parthians moved into the power vacuum to take over the old Persian lands. Antiochus' aggressive Hellenizing (or de-Judaizing) activities provoked a full scale armed rebellion in Judea—the Maccabean Revolt. [39] Efforts to deal with both the Parthians and the Jews as well as retain control of the provinces at the same time proved beyond the weakened empire's power. Antiochus died during a military expedition against the Parthians in 164 BC.

Civil war and further decay Edit

After the death of Antiochus IV Epiphanes, the Seleucid Empire became increasingly unstable. Frequent civil wars made central authority tenuous at best. Epiphanes' young son, Antiochus V Eupator, was first overthrown by Seleucus IV's son, Demetrius I Soter in 161 BC. Demetrius I attempted to restore Seleucid power in Judea particularly, but was overthrown in 150 BC by Alexander Balas – an impostor who (with Egyptian backing) claimed to be the son of Epiphanes. Alexander Balas reigned until 145 BC when he was overthrown by Demetrius I's son, Demetrius II Nicator. Demetrius II proved unable to control the whole of the kingdom, however. While he ruled Babylonia and eastern Syria from Damascus, the remnants of Balas' supporters – first supporting Balas' son Antiochus VI, then the usurping general Diodotus Tryphon – held out in Antioch.

Meanwhile, the decay of the Empire's territorial possessions continued apace. By 143 BC, the Jews in the form of the Maccabees had fully established their independence. Parthian expansion continued as well. In 139 BC, Demetrius II was defeated in battle by the Parthians and was captured. By this time, the entire Iranian Plateau had been lost to Parthian control.

Demetrius Nicator's brother, Antiochus VII Sidetes, took the throne after his brother's capture. He faced the enormous task of restoring a rapidly crumbling empire, one facing threats on multiple fronts. Hard-won control of Coele-Syria was threatened by the Jewish Maccabee rebels. Once-vassal dynasties in Armenia, Cappadocia, and Pontus were threatening Syria and northern Mesopotamia the nomadic Parthians, brilliantly led by Mithridates I of Parthia, had overrun upland Media (home of the famed Nisean horse herd) and Roman intervention was an ever-present threat. Sidetes managed to bring the Maccabees to heel and frighten the Anatolian dynasts into a temporary submission then, in 133, he turned east with the full might of the Royal Army (supported by a body of Jews under the Hasmonean prince, John Hyrcanus) to drive back the Parthians.

Sidetes' campaign initially met with spectacular success, recapturing Mesopotamia, Babylonia, and Media. In the winter of 130/129 BC, his army was scattered in winter quarters throughout Media and Persis when the Parthian king, Phraates II, counter-attacked. Moving to intercept the Parthians with only the troops at his immediate disposal, he was ambushed and killed at the Battle of Ecbatana in 129 BC. Antiochus Sidetes is sometimes called the last great Seleucid king.

After the death of Antiochus VII Sidetes, all of the recovered eastern territories were recaptured by the Parthians. The Maccabees again rebelled, civil war soon tore the empire to pieces, and the Armenians began to encroach on Syria from the north.

Collapse (100–63 BC) Edit

By 100 BC, the once-formidable Seleucid Empire encompassed little more than Antioch and some Syrian cities. Despite the clear collapse of their power, and the decline of their kingdom around them, nobles continued to play kingmakers on a regular basis, with occasional intervention from Ptolemaic Egypt and other outside powers. The Seleucids existed solely because no other nation wished to absorb them – seeing as they constituted a useful buffer between their other neighbours. In the wars in Anatolia between Mithridates VI of Pontus and Sulla of Rome, the Seleucids were largely left alone by both major combatants.

Mithridates' ambitious son-in-law, Tigranes the Great, king of Armenia, however, saw opportunity for expansion in the constant civil strife to the south. In 83 BC, at the invitation of one of the factions in the interminable civil wars, he invaded Syria and soon established himself as ruler of Syria, putting the Seleucid Empire virtually at an end.

Seleucid rule was not entirely over, however. Following the Roman general Lucullus' defeat of both Mithridates and Tigranes in 69 BC, a rump Seleucid kingdom was restored under Antiochus XIII. Even so, civil wars could not be prevented, as another Seleucid, Philip II, contested rule with Antiochus. After the Roman conquest of Pontus, the Romans became increasingly alarmed at the constant source of instability in Syria under the Seleucids. Once Mithridates was defeated by Pompey in 63 BC, Pompey set about the task of remaking the Hellenistic East, by creating new client kingdoms and establishing provinces. While client nations like Armenia and Judea were allowed to continue with some degree of autonomy under local kings, Pompey saw the Seleucids as too troublesome to continue doing away with both rival Seleucid princes, he made Syria into a Roman province.

The Seleucid empire's geographical span, from the Aegean Sea to what is now Afghanistan and Pakistan, created a melting pot of various peoples, such as Greeks, Armenians, Georgians, Persians, Medes, Assyrians and Jews. The immense size of the empire, followed by its encompassing nature, encouraged the Seleucid rulers to implement a policy of ethnic unity—a policy initiated by Alexander.

The Hellenization of the Seleucid empire was achieved by the establishment of Greek cities throughout the empire. Historically significant towns and cities, such as Antioch, were created or renamed with more appropriate Greek names. The creation of new Greek cities and towns was aided by the fact that the Greek mainland was overpopulated and therefore made the vast Seleucid empire ripe for colonization. Colonization was used to further Greek interest while facilitating the assimilation of many native groups. Socially, this led to the adoption of Greek practices and customs by the educated native classes to further themselves in public life, and at the same time the ruling Macedonian class gradually adopted some of the local traditions. By 313 BC, Hellenic ideas had begun their almost 250-year expansion into the Near East, Middle East, and Central Asian cultures. It was the empire's governmental framework to rule by establishing hundreds of cities for trade and occupational purposes. Many of the existing cities began—or were compelled by force—to adopt Hellenized philosophic thought, religious sentiments, and politics although the Seleucid rulers did incorporate Babylonian religious tenets to gain support. [41]

Synthesizing Hellenic and indigenous cultural, religious, and philosophical ideas met with varying degrees of success—resulting in times of simultaneous peace and rebellion in various parts of the empire. Such was the case with the Jewish population of the Seleucid empire the Jews' refusal to willingly Hellenize their religious beliefs or customs posed a significant problem which eventually led to war. Contrary to the accepting nature of the Ptolemaic empire towards native religions and customs, the Seleucids gradually tried to force Hellenization upon the Jewish people in their territory by outlawing Judaism. This eventually led to the revolt of the Jews under Seleucid control, which would later lead to the Jews achieving independence from the Seleucid empire.

As with the other major Hellenistic armies, the Seleucid army fought primarily in the Greco-Macedonian style, with its main body being the phalanx. The phalanx was a large, dense formation of men armed with small shields and a long pike called the sarissa. This form of fighting had been developed by the Macedonian army in the reign of Philip II of Macedon and his son Alexander the Great. Alongside the phalanx, the Seleucid armies used a great deal of native and mercenary troops to supplement their Greek forces, which were limited due to the distance from the Seleucid rulers' Macedonian homeland. The size of the Seleucid army usually varied between 70,000 and 200,000 in manpower.

The distance from Greece put a strain on the Seleucid military system, as it was primarily based around the recruitment of Greeks as the key segment of the army. In order to increase the population of Greeks in their kingdom, the Seleucid rulers created military settlements. There were two main periods in the establishment of settlements, firstly under Seleucus I Nicator and Antiochus I Soter and then under Antiochus IV Epiphanes. The military settlers were given land, "varying in size according to rank and arm of service'. [42] They were settled in 'colonies of an urban character, which at some point could acquire the status of a polis". [43] Unlike the Ptolemaic military settlers, who were known as Kleruchoi, the Seleucid settlers were called Katoikoi. The settlers would maintain the land as their own and in return they would serve in the Seleucid army when called. The majority of settlements were concentrated in Lydia, northern Syria, the upper Euphrates and Media. The Greeks were dominant in Lydia, Phrygia and Syria. [44] For example, Antiochus III brought Greeks from Euboea, Crete and Aetolia and settled them in Antioch. [45]

These settlers would be used to form the Seleucid phalanx and cavalry units, with picked men put into the kingdom's guards regiments. The rest of the Seleucid army would consist of a large number of native and mercenary troops, who would serve as light auxiliary troops. However, by the time of the Daphne Parade in 166 BC, the large number of ethnic contingents were missing from the army of Antiochus IV. This was most likely due to the army reform that was undertaken by Antiochus IV. [46] In his reign, Antiochus IV had built 15 new cities "and their association with the increased phalanx. at Daphne is too obvious to be ignored". [47]

As a Hegemonic empire, much of the state's wealth accumulation centered around maintaining its sizable military. [48] [49] [50] [51] While the motive is simple enough, the Seleucid empire boasts of a sophisticated political economy that extracts wealth from local temples, cities (or poleis), and royal estates much of which was inherited from their Achaemenid predecessors. Recent discussion indicates a market-oriented economy under the Seleucids. [51] However, evidencing limits our understanding of the Seleucid economy to the Hellenistic Near-East that is, through their holdings in Syria, Asia Minor, and Mesopotamia. Little is known about the economy of the Upper Satrapies.

Monetization Edit

Currency plays an increasingly central role under the Seleucids however, we should note that monetization was nothing new in their newly acquired lands. [51] Rather, the introduction and widespread implementation of currency is attributed to Darius I's tax reforms centuries prior [51] hence, the Seleucids see a continuation rather than shift in this practice, i.e. the payment of taxation in silver or, if necessary, in kind. [48] In this regard, the Seleucids are notable for paying their sizeable armies exclusively in silver. [50] Nevertheless, there are two significant developments of currency during the Seleucid period: the adoption of the “Attic Standard” in certain regions, [51] and the popularization of bronze coinage. [50]

The adoption of the Attic standard was not uniform across the realm. The Attic standard was already the common currency of the Mediterranean prior to Alexander's conquest that is, it was the preferred currency for foreign transactions. [50] As a result, coastal regions under the Seleucids —Syria and Asia Minor—were quick to adopt the new standard. [50] In Mesopotamia however, the millennia-old shekel (weighing 8.33g Silver) prevailed over the Attic standard. [50] According to Historian R.J. van der Spek, this is due to their particular method in recording price, which favored bartering over monetary transactions. [51] The Mesopotamians used the value of one shekel as a fixed reference point, against which the amount of a good is given. [51] [52] Prices themselves are accounted in terms of their weight in silver per ton, i.e. 60g Silver, Barley, June 242 BCE. [52] The minute difference in weight between a Shekel and Didrachm (weighing 8.6g Silver) could not be expressed in this barter system. And the use of a Greek tetradrachm would be "a far too heavy denomination…in daily trade." [51]

Bronze coinage, dating from the late fifth and fourth century, and was popularized as a "fiduciary" currency facilitating "small-scale exchanges" in the Hellenistic period. [51] [50] It was principally a legal tender which circulated only around its locales of production[3]however, the great Seleucid mint at Antioch during Antiochus III's reign (which Numismatist Arthur Houghton dubs "The Syrian and Coele-Syrian Experiment") began minting bronze coins (weighing 1.25–1.5g) to serve a "regional purpose." [53] The reasons behind this remain unclear. However, Spek notes a chronic shortage of silver in the Seleucid empire. [51] In fact, Antiochus I's heavy withdrawal of silver from a satrap is noted by the Babylonian astronomical diary (AD No. –273 B ‘Rev. 33’): "purchases in Babylon and other cities were made in Greek bronze coins." [51] This was unprecedented because "in official documents [bronze coins] played no part" [51] it was a sign of "hardship" for the Seleucids. [51] Nevertheless, the low denomination of bronze coinage meant it was used in tandem with bartering making it a popular and successful medium of exchange. [50]

Agriculture Edit

Agriculture, like most pre-modern economies, constituted a vast majority of the Seleucid economy. Somewhere between 80 and 90% of the Seleucid population was employed, [48] in some form, within the prevailing agricultural structures inherited from their Neo-Babylonian and Achaemenid predecessors. [50] These included temples, poleis, and royal estates. We should clarify that the term poleis, according to Spek, did not confer any special status to cities in the Seleucid sources it was simply the term for "city"—Greek or otherwise. [48] Regardless, agricultural produce varied from region to region. But in general, Greek poleis produced: “grain, olives and their oil, wine…figs, cheese from sheep and goats, [and] meat." [50] Whereas Mesopotamian production from temple land consisted of: “barley, dates, mustard (or cascuta/dodder), cress (cardamom), sesame and wool” which, as the core region of the Seleucid empire, was also the most productive. [51] [48]

Recent evidence indicates that Mesopotamian grain production, under the Seleucids, was subject to market forces of supply and demand. [51] Traditional "primitivist" narratives of the ancient economy argue that it was "marketless" however, the Babylonian astronomical diaries show a high degree of market integration of barley and date prices—to name a few—in Seleucid Babylonia. [52] Prices exceeding 370g silver per ton in Seleucid Mesopotamia was considered a sign of famine. Therefore, during periods of war, heavy taxation, and crop failure, prices increase drastically. In an extreme example, Spek believes tribal Arab raiding into Babylonia caused barley prices to skyrocket to a whopping 1493g silver per ton from 5–8 May, 124 BCE. [52] The average Mesopotamian peasant, if working for a wage at a temple, would receive 1 shekel it "was a reasonable monthly wage for which one could buy one kor of grain= 180 [liters]." [52] While this appears dire, we should be reminded that Mesopotamia under the Seleucids was largely stable and prices remained low. [51] With encouraged Greek colonization and land reclamation increasing the supply of grain production, however, the question of whether this artificially kept prices stable is uncertain. [51]

The Seleucids also continued the tradition of actively maintaining the Mesopotamian waterways. As the greatest source of state income, the Seleucid kings actively managed the irrigation, reclamation, and population of Mesopotamia. [51] In fact, canals were often dug by royal decrees, to which "some were called the King’s Canal for that reason." [48] For example, the construction of the Pallacottas canal was able to control the water level of the Euphrates which, as Arrian notes in his Anabasis 7.21.5, required: “over two months of work by more than 10,000 Assyrians.” [48]

Role of the state—political economy Edit

As a hegemonic empire, the state's primary focus was maintaining its sizable army via wealth extraction from three major sources: [50] tribute from autonomous poleis and temples, and proportional land-tax from royal land. [54] [55] The definition of "royal land" remains contested. While all agree poleis do not constitute royal land, some remain uncertain over the status of temple land. [56] [54] Yet, they commanded notable economic power and functioned almost independently from the state. [49] Nevertheless, the Seleucid manner of extraction, in contrast to earlier regimes, is considered more "aggressive" and "predatory". [55] [49]

In theory, the Seleucid state was an absolute monarchy that did not recognize private property in our modern sense. [56] Any land that was not delegated to the poleis or temples was considered private property of the sovereign [56] thus, considered as Royal Land and liable to direct tax by the state. Here, a "proportional land-tax", that is, a tax based on the size of one's plot, is collected by the local governor (or Satrap) and sent to the capital. [54] However, there is no evidence for the amount that was taxed on any given region.

Tribute was heavily levied on poleis and temples. Although tribute is paid annually, the amount demanded increases significantly during wartime. During a civil war in 149 BCE, Demetrius II demanded the province of Judaea to pay 300 talents of silver, which was seen as "severe." [54] But this was far from an isolated case. In fact, the Babylonian Astronomical Diaries in 308/7 BCE note hefty a 50% tax on harvest "from the lands of the temple of Shamash (in Sipprar or Larsa)." [56] Nevertheless, annual tribute was "a long-accepted and uncontroversial practice." [49] Also, royal land was regularly donated to the temples and poleis albeit under the assumption that a greater share of revenue is given to the state in exchange. [56] [55]

The controversial practice of temple "despoliation", however, was a regular occurrence under the Seleucids—in contrast to earlier times. [49] Although the Seleucid kings were aware and appreciated the sacrosanctity of religious treasures, their concentration in these places "proved irresistible" in the face of "short-term fiscal constraints." [49] As an example, Antiochus III's despoliation of the Anahit Temple in Ecbatana, wherein he procured 4000 silver talents, was used to fund his Great Eastern campaign. [49] According to historian Michael J. Taylor: [49]

It is difficult to believe that these monarchs who knew enough to bow before Nabu, bake bricks for Esagil, and enforce kosher regulations in Jerusalem, would be blithely aware of the political hazards of removing Temple treasures. It is more likely that they knew the risks but took them anyway.

A rebellion in 169 BCE during Antiochus III's campaign in Egypt demonstrates that these “risks” occasionally backfire. [55] The increasingly bold interference is due, in large part, to the appointment of provincial high-priests by the monarch himself. [55] [48] Often they were his court “favorites”, [48] whose prerogatives were purely administrative essentially, they served to collect tribute for the state. [55] Unsurprisingly: “native elites profoundly feared that the arrival of a Seleucid official might quickly cascade into a wholesale removal of Temple treasures.” [49]

Academic discussion Edit

Interpretations on the Seleucid economy since the late 19th century traditionally fell between the “modernist” and “primitivist” camps. [51] [50] On one hand, the modernist view—largely associated with Michael Rostovtzeff and Eduard Meyer—argues that the Hellenistic economies operated along price-setting markets with capitalist enterprises exported over long distances in “completely monetarized markets.” [50] On the other hand, the primitivist view—associated with M.I. Finley, Karl Polanyi and Karl Bücher—interprets ancient economies as “autarchic” in nature with little to no interaction among each other.[4]However, recent discussion has since criticized these models for their grounding on "Greco-centric" sources. [48] [57]

Recent discussion has since rejected these traditional dichotomies. [51] [50] [57] According to Spek and Reger, the current view is that while the Seleucid economy—and Hellenistic economies more broadly—were partially market-oriented, and partially monetarized. [51] While the market was subject to forces of supply and demand, a majority of produce still consumed by their producers hence, "invisible" to the observer. [51] [50]


The Rise of the Seleukid Empire (323-223 BC): Seleukos I to Seleukos III - History

+£4.50 UK Delivery or free UK delivery if order is over £35
(click here for international delivery rates)

Order within the next 11 hours, 40 minutes to get your order processed the next working day!

Need a currency converter? Check XE.com for live rates

Other formats available Price
The Rise of the Seleukid Empire… ePub (1.7 MB) Add to Basket £4.99
The Rise of the Seleukid Empire… Kindle (5.0 MB) Add to Basket £4.99

The Seleukid kingdom was the largest state in the world for a century and more between Alexander&rsquos death and the rise of Rome. It was ruled for all that time by a succession of able kings but broke down twice before eventually succumbing to dynastic rivalries, simultaneous external invasions and internal grasps for independence. The first king, Seleukos I, established a pattern of rule which was unusually friendly towards his subjects, and his policies promoted the steady growth of wealth and population in many areas which had been depopulated when he took them over. In particular the dynasty was active in founding cities from Asia Minor to Central Asia. Its work set the social and economic scene of the Middle East for many centuries to come. Yet these kings had to be warriors too as they defended their realm from jealous neighbours.

John D Grainger&rsquos trilogy charts the rise and fall of this superpower of the ancient world. In this first volume, John D Grainger relates the remarkable twists of fortune and daring that saw Seleukos, an officer in an elite guard unit, emerge from the wars of the Diadochi (Alexander&rsquos successors) in control of the largest and richest part of the empire of the late Alexander the Great. After his conquests and eventual murder, we then see how his successors continued his policies, including the repeated wars with the Ptolemaic rulers of Egypt over control of Syria. The volume ends with the deep internal crisis and the Wars of the Brothers, which left only a single member of the dynasty alive in 223 BC.

The book is well written and the narrative is engaging.

Read the full review here

Army Rumour Service (ARRSE)

Click here to read the full review

UNRV - reviewed by Philip Matyszak

This first book in the series follows the twists and turns as Seleukos I rose from the rank of officer in an elite guard unit to leader of a new and vibrant Empire. It reads with the pull of a novel and shows how the new Empire rose and fell.

Firetrench

About John D Grainger

John D Grainger is a former teacher and historian of great experience with a particular interest in Classical and Hellenistic Greek history. His many previous works include the following for Pen & Sword: Hellenistic and Roman Naval Wars (2011) The Wars of the Maccabees (2012) Roman Conquests: Egypt and Judaea (2013) a three-part history of the Seleukid Empire (2014-16), King&rsquos and Kingship in the Hellenistic World 350-30 BC (2017), Antipater&rsquos Dynasty (2018), Ancient Dynasties (2019), The Roman Imperial Succession (March 2020) and The Galatians (August 2020). He lives in Evesham, Worcestershire.


The Seleukid Empire of Antiochus III 223 187 BC Online PDF eBook

DOWNLOAD The Seleukid Empire of Antiochus III 223 187 BC PDF Online. Amazon.com The Seleukid Empire of Antiochus III 223 187 . The Seleukid Empire of Antiochus III . The second volume in John Grainger s history of the Seleukid Empire is devoted to the reign of Antiochus III. Too often remembered only as the man who lost to the Romans at Magnesia, Antiochus is here revealed as one of the most powerful and capable rulers of the age. . Download to your computer. Mac . JJ s Wargames The Seleukid Empire of Antiochus III, 223 . The Seleukid Empire of Antiochus III, 223 187BC John D Grainger Book Review by Mr Steve This is the middle book of a three part trilogy covering the Rise and Fall of the Seleucid Empire, I read the other two first and left this one until last because Antiochus’ III reign is quite well known, well to me at least, this is because there are . The Fall of the Seleukid Empire 187 75 BC by John D . Read The Fall of the Seleukid Empire 187 75 BC by John D Grainger for free with a 30 day free trial. Read unlimited* books and audiobooks on the web, iPad, iPhone and Android. The Rise of the Seleukid Empire (323 223 BC) Seleukos I . The Rise of the Seleukid Empire (323 223 BC) Seleukos I to Seleukos III by Grainger John D free mobi epub ebooks download The Seleukid Empire Roblox The Seleukid Empire is a group on Roblox owned by Metrodoros with 448 members. 퐓퐡퐞 퐒퐞퐥퐞퐮퐤퐢퐝 퐄퐦퐩퐢퐫퐞 퐒퐲퐧퐨퐩퐬퐢퐬 The Macedonian Empire has crumbled, but from the ashes arose such a dominant polity. Stretching from the western reaches of Anatolia, to the scorching lands of the Levant in the south, all the way to the outlandish edges of India to the . List of Seleucid rulers Wikipedia The Seleucid dynasty or the Seleucidae (from Greek Σελευκίδαι, Seleukídai) was a Greek Macedonian royal family, founded by Seleucus I Nicator ("the Victor"), which ruled the Seleucid Empire centered in the Near East and regions of the Asian part of the earlier Achaemenid Persian Empire during the Hellenistic period PDF The Seleukid Empire of Antiochus III (223 187 BC) Free . Read and Dowload Now http goodreadslist.com.playsterbooks.com ?book=178303050XPDF The Seleukid Empire of Antiochus III (223 187 BC) Free Books .pdf KaabiNet .pdf Amazon Books 28 kaabinet November 20, 2018 Tags Amazon , books , ebook – J.D. Grainger [pdf] Amazon.com The Seleukid Empire of Antiochus III (223 187 . The second volume in John Grainger s history of the Seleukid Empire is devoted to the reign of Antiochus III. Too often remembered only as the man who lost to the Romans at Magnesia, Antiochus is here revealed as one of the most powerful and capable rulers of the age. . Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App. Related . (PDF) The Inception of the Seleukid Empire JAH (2017) 5 . Download with Google Download with Facebook or download with email. The Inception of the Seleukid Empire JAH (2017) 5(1) 1 25. Download. eBook . eBook John D. Grainger Amazon.com.au . Download one of our FREE Kindle apps to start reading Kindle books on all your devices. Apple. . The second volume in John Grainger s history of the Seleukid Empire is devoted to the reign of Antiochus III. Too often remembered only as the man who . The Seleukid Empire THE SELEUKID EMPIRE An Online Sourcebook for the History, Numismatics, Epigraphy, Art and Archaeology of the Seleukid Empire Last updated April 11, 2006 The Rise of the Seleukid Empire (323 223 BC) The Seleukid kingdom was the largest state in the world for a century and more between Alexander s death and the rise of Rome. It was ruled for all that time by a succession of able kings, but broke down twice, before eventually succumbing to dynasti John D Grainger Seleukid Empire of Antiochus III (ePUB . ebook (ePUB), by John D Grainger . The second volume in John Grainger s history of the Seleukid Empire is devoted to the reign of Antiochus . John D Grainger Seleukid Empire of Antiochus III (PDF . Seleukid Empire of Antiochus III by John D Grainger is a digital PDF ebook for direct download to PC, Mac, Notebook, Tablet, iPad, iPhone, Smartphone, eReader but not for Kindle. A DRM capable reader equipment is required. Download Books The Fall of the Seleukid Empire 187 75 BC . Download Books The Fall of the Seleukid Empire 187 75 BC PDF FreeRead Book PDF Online Here http pdfnes.site ?book=1783030305Download Books The Fall of the Seleukid . The Seleukid Empire of Antiochus III The second volume in John Grainger s history of the Seleukid Empire is devoted to the reign of Antiochus III. Too often remembered only as the man who lost to the Romans at Magnesia, Antiochus is here revealed as one of the most powerful and capable eBook . Having emerged from civil war in 223 as the sole survivor of the Seleukid dynasty, he shouldered the burdens of a weakened and divided realm. Though defeated by Egypt in the Fourth Syrian War, he gradually restored full control over the empire. Seleucid Empire Wikipedia The Finances and Financial Administration of the Seleukid Empire, Cambridge, 2004. Laurent Capdetrey, Le pouvoir séleucide. Territoire, administration, finances d un royaume hellénistique (312 129 avant J.C.)..

The Seleucid Empire Between Orientalism and . Download with Google Download with Facebook or download with email. . The Seleukid Empire A Very Short History The history of the Seleukids begins, as it must, with the Macedonian conquest of the east in the reign of Alexander III, known as The Great (perhaps an allusion to his being the next Great King of the Near Eastern imperial tradition . Download Free.


The Rise of the Seleukid Empire, 323-223 BC

The Seleukid kingdom was the largest state in the world for a century and more between Alexander&aposs death and the rise of Rome. The first king, Seleukos I, established a pattern of rule which was unusually friendly towards his subject The first of three books on the ancient Greek dynasty "reads with the pull of a novel and shows how the new Empire rose and fell."--Firetrench

The Seleukid kingdom was the largest state in the world for a century and more between Alexander's death and the rise of Rome. The first king, Seleukos I, established a pattern of rule which was unusually friendly towards his subjects, and his policies promoted the steady growth of wealth and population in many areas which had been depopulated when he took them over. In particular the dynasty was active in founding cities from Asia Minor to Central Asia. Its work set the social and economic scene of the Middle East for many centuries to come. Yet these kings had to be warriors too as they defended their realm from jealous neighbors.

John D Grainger's trilogy charts the rise and fall of this superpower of the ancient world. In the first volume, he relates the remarkable twists of fortune and daring that saw Seleukos, an officer in an elite guard unit, emerge from the wars of the Diadochi (Alexander's successors) in control of the largest and richest part of the empire of the late Alexander the Great. After his conquests and eventual murder, we then see how his successors continued his policies, including the repeated wars with the Ptolemaic rulers of Egypt over control of Syria. The volume ends with the deep internal crisis and the Wars of the Brothers, which left only a single member of the dynasty alive in 223 BC. . more


The Rise of the Seleukid Empire (323-223 BC): Seleukos I to Seleukos III - History

The Seleukid kingdom was the largest state in the world for a century and more between Alexander&rsquos death and the rise of Rome. It was ruled for all that time by a succession of able kings but broke down twice before eventually succumbing to dynastic rivalries, simultaneous external invasions and internal grasps for independence. The first king, Seleukos I, established a pattern of rule which was unusually friendly towards his subjects, and his policies promoted the steady growth of wealth and population in many areas which had been depopulated when he took them over. In particular the dynasty was active in founding cities from Asia Minor to Central Asia. Its work set the social and economic scene of the Middle East for many centuries to come. Yet these kings had to be warriors too as they defended their realm from jealous neighbors.

John D Grainger&rsquos trilogy charts the rise and fall of this superpower of the ancient world. In this first volume, John D Grainger relates the remarkable twists of fortune and daring that saw Seleukos, an officer in an elite guard unit, emerge from the wars of the Diadochi (Alexander&rsquos successors) in control of the largest and richest part of the empire of the late Alexander the Great. After his conquests and eventual murder, we then see how his successors continued his policies, including the repeated wars with the Ptolemaic rulers of Egypt over control of Syria. The volume ends with the deep internal crisis and the Wars of the Brothers, which left only a single member of the dynasty alive in 223 BC.

About The Author

John D Grainger is a former teacher and historian of great experience with a particular interest in Classical and Hellenistic Greek history.


The Rise of the Seleukid Empire, 323� BC

-->
Read Aloud

This title will be released on .

This eBook is no longer available for sale.

This eBook is not available in your country.

The first of three books on the ancient Greek dynasty “reads with the pull of a novel and shows how the new Empire rose and fell.”—Firetrench

The Seleukid kingdom was the largest state in the world for a century and more between Alexander’s death and the rise of Rome. The first king, Seleukos I, established a pattern of rule which was unusually friendly towards his subjects, and his policies promoted the steady growth of wealth and population in many areas which had been depopulated when he took them over. In particular the dynasty was active in founding cities from Asia Minor to Central Asia. Its work set the social and economic scene of the Middle East for many centuries to come. Yet these kings had to be warriors too as they defended their realm from jealous neighbors.

John D Grainger’s trilogy charts the rise and fall of this superpower of the ancient world. In the first volume, he relates the remarkable twists of fortune and daring that saw Seleukos, an officer in an elite guard unit, emerge from the wars of the Diadochi (Alexander’s successors) in control of the largest and richest part of the empire of the late Alexander the Great. After his conquests and eventual murder, we then see how his successors continued his policies, including the repeated wars with the Ptolemaic rulers of Egypt over control of Syria. The volume ends with the deep internal crisis and the Wars of the Brothers, which left only a single member of the dynasty alive in 223 BC.


Watch the video: Rise and Fall of the Seleucid Empire Who were the Seleucids? (May 2022).


Comments:

  1. Napo

    It is remarkable, rather amusing piece

  2. Saadya

    I protest against it.

  3. Oded

    Absurd situation resulted

  4. Rexlord

    It is interesting. Can you tell me where I can read about this?

  5. Zusho

    It is very a pity to me, that I can help nothing to you. But it is assured, that you will find the correct decision. Do not despair.



Write a message